De laatste post

Orienteering-news website

maandag, april 06, 2009

Lessons in humility at Orient'Show

Not too many big stars at Orient'Show this year, but that didn't change the intensity of the competitions. The men's final was the closest decision we've seen in Villeneuve D'Ascq and took also the longest time to actually decide who won. The women's class ended up as predicted in our preview. The relay was once again a horror story.

Unlike our SpringCup report, which was perceived as "tabloid like" and "Hoekie like harsh" by some, this report is a quality publication (written entirely from memory). Before compaining about it in the future, De Laatste Post is, indeed, a healthy mix of really good content and cyclo-cross style imaginary WC reports.


The event site


Let's start with the qualifiers on saturday. Since there were less than 64 participants, they would only be training races for the real competitions on sunday and the relay qualification on saturday evening. There was only one unexpected thing to note and that was the appearance of the English running Dave Schorah, we missed him in our preview, but he managed to win one of the 4 qualification races and in addition had the fastest cumulative time over the 4 races. Two other courses were won by Slok's Bruno De Lat and the other one by your reporter. The other favourites didn't dissapoint either, with Pierre-Marie Lesaffre, Thomas van der Kleij and Desmond Franssen performing steady. Newcomer to the Orient'Show concept Ken Peeters, started of badly, but improved his performances throughout the event. Our sixth man, Bram Vyncke had only run a few orienteering races before, but always managed pretty good results too.


How you get and keep people in orienteering


In the women's class, Miek Fabré turned out to be the clear favourite, with mostly Els Talloen and Camille Moulière also finishing quite good. An Frederickx showed she had some room for improvement.

We decided ourselves we were the clear favourites for the relay, with two strong teams: van der Kleij, Franssen, Hoekx (last year's winners) and De Lat, Fabré and Peeters in the second team. And during the race, we finished easily in the first two positions, but we did not know how many penalties we would have suffered. According to the results: 10 each, so both team ended up barely qualifying in the best 8, with 5 minutes penalty time. We don't really believe that of course, we suspect some maps or SI numbers were mangled and some runners took a few faulty butterfly loops because of that. Not that it did matter all that much, since there was news that all teams would be allowed in the final.


Slok team


Finals
The 1/4 finals were still a walk in the park for some, with the best runners in separate heats and only competition in one of them. Only one top runner out, with Paul Bolsens not being able to run due to an injury.

The 1/2 finals were serious business, since there were about 8 candidates for the 4 final positions. In heat A, there was Lesaffre, Schorah, Peeters and your reporter, the others, van der Kleij, Franssen, De Lat and Jerome Baudson in the other.

De Lat was the first one to start and immediately ran a superb race in heat B. Next up was your reporter, also racing quite well in heat A. The next change was Schorah's arrival, taking the lead with 8 seconds in heat A. The same thing happened in heat B, with van der Kleij being faster than De Lat. Franssen finished next, beating van der Kleij's time, but had two penalties and was out. Lesaffre also suffered two penalties, but his time was not good enough either. It also wasn't Baudson's day, so the final decision was Peeters's. He ran quite good, but in the end, was 7 seconds too slow to make it to the final.


Women's Final


The women's class was less exciting, but nonetheless full of surprises. Fabré won easily and it was quite clear no-one but herself could loose the title in the final race. Frederickx suprised herself by finishing second and thus making it into the final. The second heat was won by Talloen, with Moulière in second position.

Overall, 6/8 runners in the finals would be Slok runners!


Men's Final participants


You can read about the men's final in Schorah's training log, but we can give you some more details (from behind, that is!).

The start was already problematic for van der Kleij, with his SI start control being too slow. The final had a butterfly in a butterfly and Schorah and your reporter had the hilly part first, while van der Kleij and De Lat had the other part. Schorah was the first one to leave the butterfly, followed shortly by your reporter and van der Kleij and De Lat. I a small hesitation in the labyrinth and van der Kleij and De Lat passed me. More problems: while De Lat was punching the last control in the labyrinth, the SI station got loose and was thrown a few meters back, so vdK and me had to go back to it, loosing valuable seconds and our position nearby. This meant Schorah won and De Lat punched second, vdK third, but van der Kleij ended up receiving the second position because he started a few seconds later.

But...

Then we had to pass the computer: Schorah, two penalties, me, also two, van der Kleij and De Lat 10 penalties! Unbelievable you'd say. Everyone was certain they did not mispunch a control. van der Kleij and De Lat indeed got mixed up in the computer, but they still had two mistakes then, no changes to the final standings there. It turned out everyone picked the same wrong control in the labyrinth and now the three Belgians also realised they had indeed forgot or mispunched another control. Schorah's other mistake is still inexplicable, since the other runners saw him punch the control. (The speaker was too loud in certain parts to clearly hear the SI beep). But the final result was indeed the order in which the runners were ranked after the finish.


Men's podium


Miek Fabré showed her iron nerves during the final, starting as the clear favourite and winning the race, despite two penalties. Talloen finished second, but had three penalties, so she was passed by Moulière and Frederickx, both without mistakes.


Women's podium


Relay Final


Van der Kleij still changing his clothes while the others were starting.


The relay final start was quite chaotic. Our first team, with van der Kleij had starting problems once again (see photo). Some more teams also missed the start (SLOW). Due to the forking it was not really clear who was in the lead, but suddenly van der Kleij had a huge gap to De Lat and so Franssen could start off, controlling the race, with Fabré racing to close the gap (the inverse of the qualifications, where De Lat was the first one to finish). After two runners, it was still Slok 3 in the lead, in front of Slok 2, but the decision was already made, all further efforts by the leading team would be pretty much worthless, since vdK forgot one butterfly loop (presumably because of the catch up he had to do after the start). In the end, Slok 3 finished first, but with 8 penalties. Slok 2 was the real winner, followed by a Guyancourt team and Vervins.


Relay podium


It should also be noted that the first sun of the weekend started to shine right after the prizegiving ceremony, just in time for De Ronde.

11 Comments:

  • At 6/4/09 13:44, Blogger An said…

    Deze reactie is verwijderd door de auteur.

     
  • At 6/4/09 14:02, Blogger JeroenH said…

    Sorry An.

    Het is aangepast, maar ik denk dat er wel nog een paar foutjes instaan, want er zijn nog steeds geen uitslagen om het na te kijken...

     
  • At 6/4/09 14:03, Blogger An said…

    tis ni erg, ge hebt anders goed in uw geheugen gegraven ;)

     
  • At 6/4/09 16:45, Blogger dries said…

    Er staat ook ergens een contradictio in terminis.
    "But the final result was indeed the order in which the runners arrived at the finish." lijkt me niet te kloppen aangezien bruno voor thomas arrivede at the finish.

     
  • At 6/4/09 21:14, Blogger Yves said…

    Wat een thriller! Meer van dat!

     
  • At 6/4/09 22:10, Anonymous Simon said…

    About the final... Well the last two runners were not mixed up, contrary to what we first believe. It was due to a known bug with OE checking algorithm when once mispunches the central control of a butterfly. Then it can not provide a reliable count of mps anymore (it appears as if you forgot a loop if you dont look carefully). Even it it is not the first time it happends, it is a hell to check such a situation, and quite stressful.

    We have the solution for this but didn't have time to push it in the system. Hopefully next year. We will also directly display mistakes on a screen map to runners, right after downloading their chip - it will make things easier to understand.

    I only checked the last two runners, and can asses that there was two penalties each (same controls), because each mp were replaced by another wrong punch.

    Cant tell what happens for Dave though, as I dont have the splits right now.

     
  • At 6/4/09 22:56, Blogger remox said…

    ciao An, sei terza! brava!
    ma tu e Els qualche volta parlate in italiano? :-)

     
  • At 7/4/09 00:10, Blogger An said…

    remox > grazie! Els ed io ci diciamo 'ciao bella' e 'a presto' ma niente di più... aspettiamo te per fare quattro chiacchiere in italiano :)

     
  • At 7/4/09 00:23, Anonymous Bruno De Lat said…

    I can imagine that it must have been a stressful check to control the double butterfly... and good that you manually could find the proper solution in the end. Dave disserved his victory!

    A screen which marks al the errors would be great... because you have no idea where you make the mistakes. Same for the relay. You want to know who to blame ;)

    But the most important for me is that it was a very nice weekend. Next year, i would like to come back,... let's hope it will be on a new map and with at least the same number of competitors as last year!

    thank you Valmo!

     
  • At 18/3/10 09:03, Anonymous Anoniem said…

    Do You interesting of [b]Viagra 100mg dosage[/b]? You can find below...
    [size=10]>>>[url=http://listita.info/go.php?sid=1][b]Viagra 100mg dosage[/b][/url]<<<[/size]

    [URL=http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/link/buy%20viagra/1_valentine3.html][IMG]http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/img0/buy%20viagra/1_valentine3.png[/IMG][/URL]
    [URL=http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/link/buy%20viagra/3_headsex1.html][IMG]http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/img0/buy%20viagra/3_headsex1.png[/IMG][/URL]
    [b]Bonus Policy[/b]
    Order 3 or more products and get free Regular Airmail shipping!
    Free Regular Airmail shipping for orders starting with $200.00!

    Free insurance (guaranteed reshipment if delivery failed) for orders starting with $300.00!
    [b]Description[/b]

    Generic Viagra (sildenafil citrate; brand names include: Aphrodil / Edegra / Erasmo / Penegra / Revatio / Supra / Zwagra) is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction regardless of the cause or duration of the problem or the age of the patient.
    Sildenafil Citrate is the active ingredient used to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men. It can help men who have erectile dysfunction get and sustain an erection when they are sexually excited.
    Generic Viagra is manufactured in accordance with World Health Organization standards and guidelines (WHO-GMP). Also you can find on our sites.
    Generic Viagra is made with thorough reverse engineering for the sildenafil citrate molecule - a totally different process of making sildenafil and its reaction. That is why it takes effect in 15 minutes compared to other drugs which take 30-40 minutes to take effect.
    [b][/b]
    Even in the most sexually liberated and self-satisfied of nations, many people still yearn to burn more, to feel ready for bedding no matter what the clock says and to desire their partner of 23 years as much as they did when their love was brand new.
    The market is saturated with books on how to revive a flagging libido or spice up monotonous sex, and sex therapists say “lack of desire” is one of the most common complaints they hear from patients, particularly women.

     
  • At 28/4/14 09:41, Anonymous generic viagra 100mg said…

    Nice Post Love reading It


    kamagra100mg

    Apcalis 20 mg

    Tadalis

     

Een reactie plaatsen

<< Home